<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Belmont be a lab for green innovation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingbelmont.com/2009/10/can-belmont-be-a-lab-for-green-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingbelmont.com/2009/10/can-belmont-be-a-lab-for-green-innovation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dr2chase</title>
		<link>http://bloggingbelmont.com/2009/10/can-belmont-be-a-lab-for-green-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>dr2chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingbelmont.com/?p=2314#comment-704</guid>
		<description>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#039;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes -- both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s like to be zoning issues involved, too -- we&#039;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#39;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes &#8212; both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).</p>
<p>There&#39;s like to be zoning issues involved, too &#8212; we&#39;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr2chase</title>
		<link>http://bloggingbelmont.com/2009/10/can-belmont-be-a-lab-for-green-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>dr2chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingbelmont.com/?p=2314#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#039;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes -- both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s like to be zoning issues involved, too -- we&#039;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#39;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes &#8212; both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).</p>
<p>There&#39;s like to be zoning issues involved, too &#8212; we&#39;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr2chase</title>
		<link>http://bloggingbelmont.com/2009/10/can-belmont-be-a-lab-for-green-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>dr2chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingbelmont.com/?p=2314#comment-677</guid>
		<description>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#039;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes -- both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s like to be zoning issues involved, too -- we&#039;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am mighty torn on this issue.  On the one hand, I think we should do it, but I don&#39;t think that people have a clear idea of how hard it will be, and when that becomes clear, there will be a lot of grumbling.  Getting to 80% for home heating requires big changes &#8212; both serious wall re-insulation and upgrading of windows and doors, plus a different heat system for anyone using oil or gas for heat (anyone using oil/gas for heat, that is probably the biggest single part of their footprint, unless they have a killer commute in a monster truck).</p>
<p>There&#39;s like to be zoning issues involved, too &#8212; we&#39;ve got a ridge that is likely to be well-placed for wind power, and big windmills on a ridge are more effective than little ones in backyards, but either way, someone is not going to want to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
